
THE POSTTRBULATION RAPTURE
8.
Supporting Arguments
First, I would like to make it clear that I would not push
any of these points. I merely give them as possible supporting evidence to what
has already been said.
In Revelation 1:9 John tells the
churches to which he is writing that he is their
“brother and fellow partaker in the
tribulation[1]
and kingdom and perseverance[2]
which are in Jesus.”
Later in this book he goes on to describe the events of the Tribulation which
are followed by the kingdom. John seems to link himself to both of these.
In Revelation 1:7 John tells the churches,
“BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS,
and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of
the earth will mourn over Him. So it is to be. Amen.” Why would John be
telling them “Look, he is coming . . .” and then go on to describe the second
coming if this was not something they expected to see? It seems that the second
coming was an event they were “looking” for.
When Jesus prayed for his disciples, he specifically asked
the Father, “I do not ask You to take
them out of the world, but to keep them from the evil one” (John 17:15). The
idea is that he didn’t want them removed from danger or temptation but rather
for God to protect them. Would he not want the same thing for us?
pre-tribulationism, on the other hand, teaches that God will “take us out of the
world” instead.
Paul and Barnabas told the believers in Lystra, Iconium, and
I cannot help but notice that when the Lord came down upon
Mt. Sinai the first time there was: the loud sound of a trumpet; lightnings;
thunderings; an earthquake; a thick cloud; fire; smoke; thick darkness; and
mankind trembling in the presence of God (Ex. 19:16-21; 20:18, 21). These same
things are also found in many of the descriptions of the second coming, although
pre-tribulationists do not recognize them as such.
It appears that the word
enistemi can not only mean “present”
but also “imminent” or “at hand.” BAGD gives a secondary meaning of “impend,
be imminent, with the connotation of threatening”[3]
as does Friberg,[4]
USB,[5]
Louw-Nida, Liddell-Scott[6]
and
Also, if the day of the Lord is the
same as the second coming, as I have tried to demonstrate,[10]
then the strict meaning of “present” would be difficult. How could the
Thessalonians have been tricked into believing that the second coming was then
“present,” since this will be an obvious event where
“every eye shall see him” (Rev. 1:7)?
It is not good practice to build our theology on types and
shadows, but they can lend support to what is taught elsewhere. When we look at
[1] Some English translations lack the definite article here, but it is present in the Greek.
[2] Compare to the hupomone, “patience of the saints,” which are in the Tribulation, where this same word is used (Rev. 13:10; 14:12).
[3] BAGD, 266.
[4] Timothy and Barbara Friberg, Analytical Lexicon to the Greek New Testament, from Bible Works CD-ROM.
[5] Barclay M. Newman, A Concise Greek-English Dictionary of the New Testament for the USB Greek Text, from Bible Works CD-ROM.
[6] Louw-Nida, Liddell-Scott, CD-ROM.
[7] George
Ricker
[8] A. T. Robertson, Robertson’s New Testament Word Pictures, from Bible Works CD-ROM.
[9] Thayer, 216.
[10] See chapter 4, Day of the Lord.
![]()