A Body
of PRACTICAL Divinity
Book 5—Chapter 1
A
Dissertation Concerning the Baptism of Jewish Proselytes Of the Various Sorts of
Proselytes Among the Jews
Intending to treat of the
admission of proselytes into the Jewish church by baptism, or dipping; it may be
proper to consider the different sorts of proselytes among the Jews, and which
of them were thus admitted, as is said. The word "proselyte" is
originally Greek, and is derived, as Philo[1]
observes, apo tou proselhluyenai, "from coming
to", that is, from one sect or religion to another, as from heathenism to
the Jewish religion; and so Suidas[2] says, proselytes
are they oi proselhluyotev, "who come from"
the Gentiles, and live according to the laws of God; and such an one is called
by the Septuagint interpreters of (Ex. 12:19; Isa. 14:1) and by the Greek
writers following them, geiwrav, which is rightly
interpreted by Hesychius, such of another nation who are called proselytes to
Israel; and which word comes near to the Hebrew word rg
and nearer still to the Chaldee word arwyg used for a
proselyte; and is, by Eusebius, interpreted epimiktouv[3],
such as were mixed with Israelites.
There were two sorts of
proselytes with the Jews, some say three; a proselyte of the gate; a mercenary
proselyte; and a proselyte of righteousness; the first and last are most usually
observed.
1. First, One sort was
called rev rg "a proselyte of the gate";
and in scripture, "the stranger that is in thy gates", (Deut. 14:21,
24:14) being a sojourner, and permitted to dwell there; hence such an one had
also the name of bwvt rg "a proselyte
inhabitant"; (see Ex. 12:15; Lev. 25:45, 47) one who was allowed to dwell
among the Jews on certain conditions; and is generally distinguished from
another sort, called a "proselyte of righteousness", of whom more
hereafter. Though the Jews, not always consistent with themselves, and so not in
this matter, sometimes interpret "the stranger in the gate", of a
proselyte inhabitant, or a proselyte by inhabitation, and sometimes of a
proselyte of righteousness. So Nachmanides[4], having
explained the stranger in the gate of a proselyte inhabitant, or one who obliged
himself to keep the seven precepts of Noah, according to the usual
interpretation of it, observes; "Our doctors interpret it differently, for
they say, ‘thy stranger within thy gate’,simply denotes, a ‘proselyte of
righteousness’." So that according to them, such a stranger may be taken
both for the one and for the other, in different respects; but commonly the
proselyte inhabitant is only understood; who in general was obliged to promise,
that he would not be guilty of idolatry, or worship any idol[5];
this he was to promise before three witnesses, for it is asked, "who is Ger
Toshab; that is, a proselyte allowed to dwell in Israel? (the answer is) Whoever
takes upon him, in the presence of three neighbours, that he will not commit
idolatry." It follows, "R. Meir, and the wise men say, whoever takes
upon him the seven precepts which the sons of Noah obliged themselves to
observe." Others say, "these do not come into the general rule of such
a proselyte. Who then is one? He is a proselyte who eats what dies of itself;
(or) who takes upon him to keep all the commandments in the law, except that
which forbids the eating of things which die of themselves[6];"
but the usual account of such a proselyte is, that he agrees to observe the
seven precepts enjoined the sons of Noah[7]; six of
which were given to Adam, the first man, and the seventh was added to them, and
given to Noah, and are as follow[8]: a. Concerning
idolatry; by this a son of Noah was forbid to worship the sun, moon, and stars,
and images of any sort; nor might he erect a statue, nor plant a grove, nor make
any image. b. Concerning blaspheming the name of God. Such an one might not
blaspheme, neither the proper name of God, Jehovah; nor any of his surnames,
titles, and epithets. c. Concerning shedding of blood, or murder, the breach of
which command he was guilty of, if he slew one, though an embryo in his mother’s
womb; and one who pursued another, when he could have escaped from him with the
loss of one of his members, &c. d. Concerning uncleanness, or impure
copulations; of which there were six sorts forbidden a son of Noah; as, with an
own mother, with a father’s wife (or stepmother), with another man’s wife,
with his sister by the mother’s side, with a male, or with mankind, and with a
beast. e. Concerning rapine, or robbery and theft; of which such were guilty,
whether they robbed a Gentile or an Israelite, or stole money, or men, or
suppressed the wages of an hireling; and the like. f. Concerning the member of a
living creature, taken from it while alive, and eating it: this is the command,
it is said, which was to Noah, and his sons, and of which the Jews interpret
Genesis 9:4. g. Concerning judgments or punishments to be inflicted on those who
broke the above laws: this command obliged them to regard the directions,
judgment, and sentence of the judges appointed to see the said laws put into
execution, and to punish delinquents.
Now such Gentiles, who laid
themselves under obligation to observe these commands, had leave to dwell among
the Israelites, though not in everyone of their cities; not in Jerusalem
particularly[9]; wherefore those devout men and
proselytes said to dwell in Jerusalem, (Acts 2:5, 10) were not proselytes of the
gate, but proselytes of righteousness. Nor are such sort of proselytes now
received, only while the Jews lived in their own land, and were not under the
jurisdiction of another people; or as they express it, while jubilees were in
use and observed[10]. This sort of proselytes, though
they did not enjoy the privileges the proselytes of righteousness did, yet some
they had; they might worship and pray in the court of the Gentiles, though not
in the temple; they might offer burnt offerings, though not other sacrifices;
their poor were fed with the poor of Israel, their sick were visited by
Israelites, and their dead were buried with them[11].
Such proselytes as these, as they were not obliged to circumcision, nor to other
commands peculiar to the Jews; none but those before observed; so neither were
they baptized, or dipped, when made proselytes, which is said of others.
Maimonides[12] affirms of such a proselyte, that he
is neither circumcised nor dipped. Bishop Kidder[13]
is therefore mistaken in saying, that proselytes of the gate were baptized, but
not circumcised.
2. Secondly, there was
another sort of proselytes, which are taken notice of, at least, by some as
such; who were called Myrkv "mercenary"
ones, and are reckoned as between proselytes of the gate and Gentiles. In Exodus
12:44, 45, a mercenary, or "hired servant", is distinguished from a
servant bought with money; he being hired only for a certain time, as for six
years; and also from a foreigner, a stranger in the gate, a proselyte of the
gate; and both of them are distinguished from the servant bought with money, who
was circumcised, and might eat of the passover, when neither of the other might,
being both uncircumcised; and therefore R. Levi Barzelonita[14]
is thought to be mistaken when he says, "a mercenary is a proselyte, who is
circumcised, but not dipped; for so the wise men explain it:" but if a
stranger or proselyte of the gate was not circumcised, much less a mercenary,
who was far below him; besides, if he was circumcised, he might eat of the
passover; which is denied him: and so Ben Melech observes[15]
of these two, the foreigner and the hired servant; they are Gentiles, and
uncircumcised: and Abendana, in his notes upon him, from the Rabbins, says, the
former is a proselyte inhabitant, or a proselyte of the gate, who takes upon him
the seven precepts of the sons of Noah; the latter is a servant whose body is
not possessed, that is, is not in the possession of his master, not being bought
with his money, is only an hired servant, and so not circumcised. But perhaps
Jarchi’s note will reconcile this to what Barzelonita says; "Toshab, a
foreigner, this is a proselyte inhabitant; and Shacir, or hired servant, this is
a Gentile;" but what is the meaning? are they not uncircumcised? (that is,
both of them) and it is said, "No uncircumcised person shall eat
thereof": but they are as a circumcised Arabian, and a circumcised
Gabnunite, or Gabonite[16], though circumcised yet
not by Israelites, but by Gentiles, which gave no right to the passover.
Hottinger[17] thinks these mercenary proselytes, and
with him Leusden[18] seems to agree, were mechanic
strangers, who left their own country, and came among the Jews for the sake of
learning some mechanic art; and who, conforming to certain laws and conditions,
prescribed by the Jews, were permitted to sojourn with them until they had
learnt the art. There are but few writers who speak of this sort of proselytes.
However, it seems agreed on all hands, that whether circumcised or not, they
were not baptized, or dipped.
3. Thirdly, There was
another sort of proselyte, called qdu rg a
"proselyte of righteousness"[19] (see Deut.
16:20) a stranger circumcised, and who is so called when he is circumcised; and
sometimes tyrb Nb rg "a proselyte, the son of
the covenant"[20], the same as an Israelite (see
Acts 3:25). This sort of proselytes were the highest, and had in greatest
esteem; who not only submitted to circumcision, but embraced all the laws,
religion, and worship of the Jews; and were in all respects as they, and enjoyed
equally all privileges and immunities, civil and religious, as they did; except
being made a king, though one might if his mother was of Israel[21];
and being members of the great Sanhedrim, yet might be of the lesser, provided
they were born of an Israelitish woman[22]; nay, even
such have been in the great Sanhedrim, as Shemaiah and Abtalion, who were of the
posterity of Sennacherib[23]; but their mothers being
Israelites, it was lawful for them to judge, that is, in the great Sanhedrim;
for one was the prince, and the other the father of that court[24].
So the Jews say[25], the posterity of Jethro sat in
Lishcat Gazith, that is, in the great Sanhedrim, which sat in that room; and for
which they quote 1 Chronicles 2:55) yet it has been a question, whether a
proselyte should be made a public minister, or president of the congregation,
called rwbu xylv; but the common opinion was, that he
might be one[26]: of this sort of proselytes, of whom
they boast, some were persons of note for learning, or wealth, or worldly
grandeur[27]; but without sufficient ground. Some,
they own, were not sincere who became proselytes, either through fear, or to
gratify some sensual lust, or for some sinister end or another. Some were called
"proselytes of lions"[28], who became so
through fear; as the Samaritans, because of the lions sent among them, and that
they might be freed from them, embraced the worship of God, though they retained
also the worship of their idols. Others were called "proselytes of
dreams"; who were directed and encouraged to become proselytes by such who
pretended to skill in dreams, as being omens of good things to them. Though
some, in the place referred to, instead of twmlx
"dreams", read "windows", and render the words
"proselytes of windows", so Alting[29],
meaning the windows of their eyes, who, to gratify the lust of the eyes, became
proselytes; as Shechem, being taken with the sight of Dinah, submitted to
circumcision for the sake of her; and others were called "proselytes of
Mordecai and Esther", who were like those who became Jews in their times,
(Esther 8:17) through fear of the Jews, as there expressed. Others were true and
sincere proselytes, who cordially embraced the Jewish religion, and from the
heart submitted to the laws and rules of it; these were called Myrwrg
Myrb "drawn proselytes"[30], who
were moved of themselves, and of their own good will, without any sinister bias,
and out of real love and affection to the Jewish religion, embraced it. Compare
the phrase with John 6:44. And such, they say[31],
all proselytes will be in the time to come, or in the days of the Messiah; and
yet sometimes they say, that then none will be received[32]:
and when persons propose to be proselytes, the Jews are very careful to ask many
questions, in order to try whether they are sincere or not; and such as they
take to be sincere they speak very highly of; they say[33],
"Greater are the proselytes at this time, than the Israelites when they
stood on mount Sinai; because they saw the lightning, heard the thunder, and the
sound of the trumpet; but these saw and heard none of these things, and yet have
taken upon them the yoke of the kingdom, and are come under the wings of the
Shechinah" though elsewhere, and in common, they speak but slightly of
them, and say; "They are as grievous to Israel as a scab in the skin, or as
a razor to it[34], because they often turn back
again, and seduce the Israelites, and carry them off with them; yea, they say
they stop the coming of the Messiah[35]."
However, they have a saying[36] which shows some
regard to them; "A proselyte, even to the tenth generation, do not despise
a Syrian, or an heathen before him, he being present, or to his face; because
till that time their minds are supposed to incline towards their own
people;" and so it is said[37], the daughter of
a proselyte may not be married to a priest, unless her mother is an Israelitess,
even unto the tenth generation. And there is another saying[38]
of theirs, Do not trust a proselyte until the twenty fourth generation, that is,
never; not only priests, Levites, and Israelites, but even bastards, and the
Nethinim, or Gibeonites, were preferred to proselytes[39].
Some of these sayings do not seem so well to agree with the words of Christ,
(Matthew 23:15) to reconcile which, it is thought[40],
that while the temple was standing, the desire of making proselytes was stronger
than after it was destroyed by the Romans; resenting that, they became
indifferent about making proselytes, and were unconcerned about the salvation of
the Gentiles, and contented themselves with receiving such only who freely came
over to them. It never was deemed so honourable to be the descendants of
proselytes, as of original Hebrews. Hence the apostle Paul gloried that he was
an Hebrew of the Hebrews, both his parents being Hebrews. A Rabbi of note among
the Jews, whose parents were both proselytes, or Gentiles, is called not by his
proper name, Jochanan, but Ben Bag-Bag; that is, the son of a Gentile man, and
the son of a Gentile woman; and for the same reason he is called in a following
paragraph, Ben He-He, numerically He being the same with Bag; though it is said,
these abbreviations were used from reverence to him, and a regard for him[41];
and, indeed, the Jews were not to reproach and upbraid proselytes with what they
and their ancestors had been, or had done; they were not to say to a proselyte,
Remember thy former works; nor were they to say to the sons of proselytes,
Remember the works of your fathers[42]; for this is
the affliction and oppression of them, as they understand it, they are cautioned
against, (Ex. 22:21; Lev. 19:33) nay, they were to love them as themselves,
because the Lord God loved the stranger, (Lev. 19:34; Deut. 10:18) for of
proselytes of righteousness they interpret these passages[43].
Now it is of this sort of
proselytes, proselytes of righteousness, that it is said, they were admitted
into covenant, and into the Jewish church, as the Israelites were; the males by
circumcision, by tlybj "baptism", or
dipping, and by sacrifice; and the females by baptism, or dipping, and by
sacrifice; and it is the baptism or dipping of these proselytes, that will be
inquired into, and be the subject of the following Dissertation.
ENDNOTES:
[1] Deut. Monarchia, l. 1. p. 818.
[2] In voce proselutoi.
[3] Eccl. Hist. l. 1. c. 7.
[4] Apud Frischmuth. Dissert. de 7.
Noach. Praecept. s. 20, 21.
[5] R. Nathan, Sepher Aruch, R. D.
Kimchi, Sepher Shorash. & Elias Levita, Sepher Tishbi in voce rwg.
[6] T. Bab. Avodah Zarah, fol. 64. 2.
[7] Philip. Aquinat. Maaric in voce rwg.
[8] Maimon. Hilchot Melacim, c. 9. s.
1. &c.
[9] Maimon. Hilchot Beth Habechirah,
c. 7. s. 14.
[10] T. Bab. Eracin, fol. 29. 1.
Maimon. Obede Cochabim, c. 10. s. 6. Milah, c. 1. s. 6.
[11] Maimon. Melacim, c. 10. s. 12.
[12] Isure Biab, c. 14. s. 7.
[13] Demonstration of the Messiah,
part 2. p. 176.
[14] Chinnuch, p. 17.
[15] Miclol Yophi in loc.
[16] Vid. T. Bab. Avodah Zarah, c.
2. fol. 27. 1. & Edzard. not. in ib. p. 292.
[17] Thesaur. Philolog. l. 1. p. 18.
[18] Philolog. Heb. Mixt. Dissert.
21. vid. Carpzov. not. ad Schickard. Jus Regium, p. 323.
[19] Zohar in Ex.od. fol. 36. 1.
& in Num. fol. 69. 4.
[20] R. Levi Ben Gersom, in Ex.od.
xxii. 21. fol. 95. 2.
[21] Maimon. Melacim. c. 1. s. 4.
[22] Ibid. Sanhedrin, c. 2. s. 1. 9.
[23] T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 96. 2.
[24] Juchasin, fol. 17. 2. & 18.
1.
[25] T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 104. 1.
& 106. 1. & Sotah, fol. 11. 1.
[26] Vid. Vitringam de Synagoga vet.
par. 2. l. 3. c. 6. p. 943.
[27] As Aristotle, Meor Enayim, c.
22. fol. 91. 2. Izates and Monbaz, the sons of queen Helena, both kings, ibid.
c. 51. fol. 161. 2. & c. 52. fol. 164. 2. 166, 167. Tzemach David, par. 1.
fol. 26. 1. & par. 2. fol. 15. 2. Nebuzaradan, the general of
Nebuchadnezzar, T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 96. 2. Antoninus Pius, the Roman
emperor, T. Hieros. Megillah, fol. 72. 1. & 74. 1. Ketiah, a prince in
Caesar’s court, Avodah Zarah, fol. 10. 2. Juchasin, fol. 66. 2. Nero, a
general of Caesar’s army, from whom sprung R. Meir, T. Bab. Gittin, fol. 56.
1. Juchasin, fol. 41. 1. & 63. 2. Tzemach David, par. 2. fol. 16. 1, 2. Of
the circumcision of these the Jews speak, but say nothing of their baptism.
[28] R. Nehemiah in T. Bab. Yebamot,
fol. 24. 2.
[29] Heptas Dissertat. par. 2. Diss.
7. de Proselytis, s. 20.
[30] T. Bab. Avodah Zarah, fol. 3.
2.
[31] Ibid. fol. 34. 1.
[32] Zohar in Gen. fol. 33. 1. &
40. 2.
[33] Medrash. apud Buxtorf. Lexic.
Talmud. Col. 411.
[34] T. Bab. Yebamot, fol. 47. 2.
& 109. 2. Kiddushin, fol. 70. 2.
[35] Niddah, fol. 13. 2.
[36] T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 94. 1.
Jarchi in Ex.od. xviii. 9.
[37] Misnah Biccurim, c. 1. s. 5.
[38] Yalkut in Ruth, fol. 163. 4.
[39] T. Hieros. Horaiot, fol. 48. 2.
[40] Vid. Wagenseil. not. in Sotah,
p. 754.
[41] Pirke Abot, c. 5. s. 22, 23.
Vid. Fagium & Leusden. in ibid.
[42] Vid. R. David Kimchi, Sepher
Shorash. rad. hny.
[43] R. Levi Ben. Gersom, in Lev.
xiv. 33, 34. fol. 163. 3. Ez Hechayim M. S. apud Wagenseil, not. in Sotah, p.
205.