
The
Total Depravity of Man
Chapter 5
TRANSMISSION
In introducing this
aspect of our subject we cannot do better than set before the reader what A. A. Hodge
pointed out in Outlines of Theology as
the self-evident moral principles which must ever
be certainly presupposed in every inquiry into the dealings of God with His responsible
creatures. (1) God cannot be the Author of sin. (2) We must not believe that He could
consistently with His own perfections create a creature de novo (anew, originally)
with a sinful nature. (3) The perfection of righteousness, not bare sovereignty, is the
grand distinction of all Gods dealings. (4) It is a heathen notion that the
"order of nature" or "the nature of things" or "natural law"
is a real agent independent of God, limiting His freedom or acting with Him as an
independent concause (joint cause) in producing effects. (5) We cannot believe that God
would inflict either moral or physical evil upon any creature whose natural rights had not
been previously forfeited.
State the two distinct questions thence arising, which,
though frequently confused, it is essential to keep separate. First, how does an
innate sinful nature originate in each human being at the commencement of his existence,
so that the Maker of the man is not the cause of his sin? If this corruption of nature
originated in Adam, how is it transmitted to us? Second, why, on what ground of
injustice, does God inflict this terrible evil, the root ground of all other evils, at the
very commencement of personal existence? What fair probation have infants born in sin
enjoyed? When, and why, were their rights as new created beings forfeited? It is
self-evident that these questions are distinct and should be treated as such. The first
may possibly be answered on physical grounds. The second question, however, concerns the
moral government of God and inquires concerning the justice of His dispensations. In the
history of theology, of all ages and in all schools, very much confusion has resulted from
the failure to emphasize and preserve prominent this distinction.
Guilt of Adams Posterity
The why has been discussed by
us at some length: the guilt of Adams offense was imputed to all his posterity
because he served as their covenant head and federal representative. Since they were
legally one with him, the punishment passed upon him falls on them too, involving them in
all the dire consequences of his crime. One of the most terrible of those consequences is
the receiving of a sinful nature, which brings us to consider the how of the great human
tragedy. We do not propose to make any attempt to enter into a philosophical or
metaphysical inquiry as to how God can be the Creator and Maker of our beings (Job 31:15),
the "Father of spirits" (Heb. 12:9), and yet not be the Author of the sin
now inhering in our natures. Rather we shall confine ourselves to an examination of the
bare facts which Scripture presents on the subject. Nowhere in the Word of God is the
pollution of fallen man ascribed to the holy One; it is uniformly attributed to human
propagation: by natural generation a corrupt offspring is begotten and conceived by
corrupt parents.
It was a divinely instituted law of the original creation that
like should produce like, which plainly appears in that clause "whose seed is in
itself" (Gen. 1:11-12), and in that oft repeated expression "after his
kind" (vv. 21, 24, 25). That law has never been revokedas the biology of every
department of nature demonstrates. Hence it follows that since the whole human race sinned
in its covenant head, and since every member of it receives its nature from him, when the
fountain itself became polluted, all the streams issuing from it were polluted too. A
corrupt tree can bring forth nothing but corrupt fruit. Since the root became unholy, its
branches must also be unholy. All of Adams offspring simply perpetuate what began in
him; from the first moment of their existence they become participants of his impurity.
Though our immediate parents are the occasion of conveying a depraved nature to their
children, that nature is derived originally from the first man. In other words, the
present relation of father and son is not that of cause and effect, but that of an
instrument or channel in transmitting the sinfulness of Adam and Eve.
In Genesis 5:3 we are told, "Adam lived an hundred and
thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image." That occurred
after his fearful defection, and the statement is in designed and direct contrast with the
declaration of verse 1: "In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made
he him." Adam did not communicate to his descendants the pure nature which he had
originally by creation, but the polluted one which he acquired by the fall. It is very
striking to note the precise place where this statement is made in the sacred
narrative: not at the beginning of Genesis 4 in connection with the begetting of Cain and
Abel, but here, introducing a lengthy obituary listshowing that dying Adam
could only beget mortals. The image of Cod included both holiness and immortality, but
since Adam had lost them and become sinful and mortal, he could propagate none but those
in his own fallen likeness, which had in it corruption and death (I Cor. 15:49-50; cf.
v.22). The copy answered to the original. Adam could not beget in any other way than in
his own image, for a clean thing will not issue from an unclean. A depraved parent could
produce nothing but a depraved child.
Born in Adams fallen likeness, not only in substance but in
qualities also, all of his posterity are but a continuous repetition of himself. This is
remarkably intimated in the opening verse of Psalm 14 which has for its theme the awful
depravity of the human race. John Owen pointed out:
There is a peculiar distinguishing mark put upon this
Psalm, in that it is found twice in the book of Psalms. The fourteenth and fifty-third
Psalms are the same, with the alteration of one or two expressions at most. And there is
another mark put upon its deep importance in that the apostle transcribed a great part of
it in Romans iii.
Psalm 14 opens with the
statement "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." The careful reader
will notice that the words "there is" have been supplied by the
translatorsunnecessarily, we feel. The fool does not say in his head, "There is
no God"; rather he says in his heart, "No God for me. I decline
allegiance to Him." It is not intellectual unbelief denying the existence of Deity,
but the enmity of a rebel who refuses to practically own or be in subjection to God.
"The fool hath said in his heart, No God. They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works" (Ps. 14:1). Most significant and noticeable is that
change of number in the pronouns, though for some strange reason it appears to have
escaped the notice of the commentatorsat any rate none whom we have consulted makes
any reference to it. As stated above, the verses which follow give a full description of
the deplorable condition of all mankind, and that is prefaced with a statement about
"the fool." Nor is there the slightest difficulty in identifying him. Who is the
fool of all fools? Adam was the arch-fool. His heart had become devoid of wisdom. Thus was
the father of our race. What could his children be like? Our verse answers, "They are
corrupt," and prove themselves to be so by doing abominable works.
"Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother
conceive me" (Ps. 51:5). This is the sad confession which every one of us makes. Born
in the likeness of Adam as a fallen creature, all of his descendants are but replicas of
himself. And since moral corruption is transmitted by him to them according to a fixed law
of heredity, that corruption dates from the very beginning of their existence. Because by
being Adams children they are depraved, it necessarily follows that they must be so
as soon as they are his children. David was the son of lawful and honorable
marriage, yet from his parents he received Adams vitiated nature with all its evil
dispositions. Note that he was careful to intimate that it was not by divine infusion, but
by natural generation and human propagation. He mentioned it, not to excuse his fearful
fall but to concede it. Matthew Henry states that David said in effect, "Had I duly
considered this before I should not have made so bold with the temptation, nor have
ventured among the sparks with such tinder in my heart." The realization that our
whole being is horribly degenerated from its pristine purity and rectitude should make us
thoroughly distrustful of self and cause us to walk most warily.
Because our very nature is contaminated, we enter the world a
mass of potential wickedness, which is one reason why Job declared, "I have said to
corruption, Thou art my father: to the worm, Thou art my mother, and my sister"
(17:14). Hervey tells us the Hebrew word there for worm signifies a grub, which is bred by
and feeds upon putrefaction. I commenced my existence with all sorts of impurity in my
nature, with every cursed propensity to evil, with everything earthly, sensual, devilish
in my mind. That depraved nature is the source of all other miseries, the root from which
proceed all evil actions. This solemn and sad fact is demonstrated by antithesis. Why was
it necessary for Christ to be incarnated supernaturally by the miracle of the virgin
birth? So that what was horn of Mary should be "that holy thing" (Luke
1:35), which would not have been the case if He had been begotten by natural generation
from a man. Though this doctrine of original sin, of antenatal defilement, is purely a
matter of divine revelation, it explains what nothing else does, namely, that "the
imagination of mans heart is evil from his youth" (Gen. 8:21) in every
instance, Christ alone excepted.
"The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as
soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent"
(Ps. 58:3-4). There are three indictments here made against fallen human nature. First,
that from the beginning of his existence man is alienated from God, divorced from His
favor, cut off from fellowship with Him. Second, that he evidences his deplorable state as
soon as he enters this world, manifesting his sinfulness in the cradle. Third, that he
turns to his own way, and the very first steps he takes are in that broad road which leads
to destruction. Why? Because his very being is poisoned and poisonous, malicious; he is at
odds with God and goodness and his fellowmen"hateful, and hating one
another" (Titus 3:3). This poison "is like the poison of a serpent." The
serpent does not acquire his venom, but is generated a poisonous creature. Poison,
deadly poison, is its very nature from the outset, and when it bites it only acts out that
with which it was born. Though its poison is hidden, it is lurking there, ready for use as
soon as it is provoked.
B.W. Newton stated:
Antecedent to all trespasses and acts of sin, before any
apprehension of good or evil has dawned upon our hearts, before any notion respecting God
has been formed in our souls, before we have uttered a word or conceived a thought,
sinessential sinis found to dwell within us. Bound up with our being, it
enters into every sensation, lives in every thought, sways every faculty. If the senses,
by means of which we communicate with the external world, had never acted: if our eye had
never seen, and our ear had never heard; if our throat had never proved itself to be an
open sepulchre, breathing forth corruption; if our tongue had never shown itself to be set
on fire of hell; still sin would have been the secret mistress of that world of thought
and feeling which is found within us, and every hidden impulse there would have been
enmity against God.
When therefore Scripture speaks
of men as sinners, it refers not only to their practice but chiefly to their evil
naturea nature which is conveyed by Adam and transmitted from parent to child in
successive generations.
"Foolishness is hound in the heart of a child; but the rod
of correction shall drive it far from him" (Prov. 22:15). This foolishness is not
merely intellectual ignorance but a positive principle of evil, for in the book of
Proverbs the "fool" is not the idiot but the sinner. This corruption is
deep-rooted. It does not lie on the surface, like some of the childs habits, which
may easily be corrected. That moral madness, as Matthew Henry pointed out, "is not
only found there, but bound there; it is annexed to the heart." It is
rooted and riveted in him from the first breath he draws. This is the birthright of all
Adams progeny. "The little innocent" is a misnomer of fondness and fancy.
John Bunyan said:
I do confess it is my opinion that children come
polluted with sin into the world, and that oft-times the sins of youth, especially while
they are very young, are rather by virtue of indwelling sin than by examples that are set
before them by others; not but they may learn to sin by example, too, but example is not
the root, but rather the temptation to sin.
The rod of correction (not of
caprice or passion) is the means prescribed by God, and under His blessing it will prevent
many an outburst of the flesh. "The rod and reproof give wisdom: but a child left to
himself bringeth his mother to shame" (Prov. 29:15). C. Bridges agreed:
"Discipline is the order of Gods government. Parents are His dispensers of it
to their children. The child must be broken in, to bear the yoke in his youth
(Lam. 3, 27). Let reproof be tried first; and if it succeed, let the rod be spared (Prov.
17, 10). If not, let it do its work." If parents fail to do their duty, there will be
sad consequences. The "mother" only is mentioned as being brought to shame,
because she is usually the most indulgent, and because she normally feels most keenly the
affliction brought upon herself by her own neglect. But fathers too are disgraced. Eli
gave reproof but spared the rod (I Sam. 2:22-25; 3:13), and paid dearly for his folly.
What dishonor was brought upon Davids name and what poignant grief must have filled
him because his perverted fondness brought his sons to their ruinone excused while
in the most aggravated sin (II Sam. 14:28-33; 15:6; 18:33), another not corrected by even
a word (I Kings 1:5-9). As E Hopkins said, "Take this for certain, that as many
deserved stripes as you spare from your children, you do but lay up for your own
backs."
A child does not have to be taught to sin. Remove all inhibitions
and prohibitions and he will bring his parents to the grave in sorrow. If the child is
humored and no real efforts are made to counteract its evil propensities, it will
assuredly grow more self-willed and intractable. How far the Scriptures are from
flattering us! A "transgressor from the womb" (Isa. 48:8) is one of the
hereditary titles of everyone entering this world. We are transgressors by internal
disposition before we are so in external acts. Every parent is the channel of moral
contagion to his offspring, who are by nature "children of disobedience" (Eph.
2:2). Original sin is transmitted as leprosy is conveyed to the children of lepers. That
is one reason why the corruption of nature is designated our "old man": it is
coeval with our beings. Our very "heart," the center of our moral being, from
which are "the issues [outgoings] of life," is deceitful above all things and
desperately wicked from the very first moment of its existence.
Some argue that if corruption is passed to all men from their
first parents, then why are not all equally corrupt? They contend that some people are not
subject to inordinate affections, but are respectable and law-abiding citizens. There are
two answers to that objection. First, although, everything else being equal, such a
conclusion is logical, it will not necessarily follow that all men will manifest the
corruption in the same manner, or even to the same extent. When we say "everything
else being equal," we include such things as the watchful care of pious parents, the
discipline of a good education, the demands and effects of a refined environment, the
positions and circumstances in which one and another may be placed. For while none of
these things, nor all of them combined, can produce any change in a persons nature,
they are factors which exert an influence on his outward conduct. Nevertheless, though one
man may have less dissolute manners than another, still his imaginations are not pure; and
though his bodily lusts may be under better control, he may yield more to the lusts of the
mind. There are diversities in mens lives, but original sin has the same
defiling effects upon all hearts.
Second, though all men are made in the likeness of fallen
Adam, God restrains, in different ways and in varying degrees, the outbreakings of
the corruption which has been transmitted to them. Nowhere is the sovereignty of God more
evident than in His disposing of the lot of one and another: denying to some the
opportunity to satisfy their evil desires, hedging up their way by poverty or ill health,
or putting them in isolated places; others are given up to their hearts lusts and
God so orders His providences that they fatten themselves as beasts for the slaughter.
Some mens callings draw out their sins more than do those of their fellowmen, so
that they are subject to frequent and fierce temptations. Various dispositions are excited
to action by the conditions in which they are placed, as Jacob was induced to trick his
father by an unscrupulous mother, or as a sight of the spoils of Jericho stirred up the
cupidity of Achan. It was for this reason that Agur was moved to pray, "Remove far
from me vanity and lies: give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient
for me: lest I be full, and deny thee, and say, Who is the LORD? Or lest I be poor, and
steal, and take the name of my God in vain" (Prov. 30:8-9).
